[REQ_ERR: COULDNT_RESOLVE_HOST] [KTrafficClient] Something is wrong. Enable debug mode to see the reason. Asus VivoBook Flip 14 - Full Review and Benchmarks | Laptop Mag

Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP412UA (i5-8250U) Convertible Review

Review asus tp412fa sb55t understand
* Login   * Register * FAQ    * Search
It is currently 11.04.2020

View unanswered posts | View active topics

Board index

All times are UTC

Asus tp412fa sb55t review

Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 4414 of 3622
 [ 7623 posts ] 
  Print view | E-mail friend Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
 Post subject: Asus tp412fa sb55t review
PostPosted: 11.04.2020 

Joined: 11.04.2020
Posts: 7113

Great for the price. The latest VivoBook convertible gets more right than wrong. The p touchscreen and integrated graphics are otherwise identical across the entire lineup. The mainstream VivoBook series sits just below the flagship ZenBook series to appeal to users on a tight budget.

Sb55t recommend checking out our review on the last generation VivoBook Flip 14 TP as it still shares many similarities with this latest sb55t. Asus has managed to cut the thickness down from 19 mm on last year's TP model to The newer design is just a hair lighter and smaller as a result without sacrificing any of the connectivity features of the previous model.

The matte chassis leaves a good first impression with asus unintended gaps or uneven crevices. The aluminum outer lid is smooth and more rigid than even the lid of the Yoga Meanwhile, the plastic base is slightly textured with a comparatively cheaper feel.

Slight but visible flexing is possible when attempting to twist the front edges or warp the center of the keyboard deck. The flexing is not enough to be a concern during regular use, but it cements the TP as a mainstream offering instead of a tp412fa Zenbook. The hinges are the weakest aspect of the chassis as they could have been more taut to reduce teetering of the lid. Overall, system rigidity is a step below the Spectre x Best Displaysfor University Students.

The ports are essentially identical to last year's TP The Kensington Lock has been moved from the left edge to the right edge, but tp412fa else has changed. Moving 1 GB worth of images from our card to desktop takes over 40 seconds compared to 6 or sb55t seconds on the Spectre x A fully inserted SD card still protrudes by over half its length.

Be sure to remove the card first for safer transporting. The Intel module has not changed for theoretical transfer rates of up to Mbps. While we experienced no issues when browsing the net, we noticed that connectivity was not always steady.

An iPerf test revealed that transfer rates would sometimes fluctuate to under Mbps once or twice every minute. We're unsure if this is widespread or something specific to our test unit. Serviceability has improved significantly over last year's model. The bottom panel is relatively easy to remove with just a Philips screwdriver and sharp edge. The RAM slot is covered by an aluminum cage sb55t the secondary 2.

The box includes no extras other than the AC adapter, Quick Start guide, and warranty card. The standard one-year limited manufacturer warranty applies. The Backspace, Enter, and Arrow keys in particular are softer than asus are used to. Clatter is moderate and close to the keys of the XPS The three-level white backlight returns.

Unlike on the TP, however, Asus has flipped the F function keys with their secondary multimedia functions. Thus, review fn key is no longer required to adjust volume, brightness, or keyboard tp412fa. Consider, azhakulla fathima mp3 think moving very slowly, however, the finger tends to stick and skip. Its integrated mouse clicks are also shallow in travel and could have benefited from stronger feedback.

Asus has unfortunately downgraded the display for the TP It could have been a cost-saving measure, but it's a very disappointing find nonetheless. Luckily, the glossy touchscreen is still crisp and free of grains. We can detect no pulse-width modulation and review bleeding is asus around the corners of our unit. Further display measurements reveal accurate grayscale and colors which we were not expecting from a budget-mainstream system.

Our calibration attempts improve sb55t display only marginally. Colors tp412fa become increasingly more inaccurate at higher saturation levels due to imperfect sRGB coverage, asus tp412fa sb55t review. If PWM was detected, review average of minimum: 5 - maximum: Hz was measured. Outdoor visibility is poor despite the flexible 2-in-1 design.

The dim display and glossy backlight only hand painted nippon tea set glare. Viewing angles are otherwise very wide with no major color shifting as one would expect from an IPS panel. These ULV CPUs cater to light office or home users where word processing, browsing, streaming, and multi-tasking take priority. CPU performance is where we expect it to be asus a Core iU. Users upgrading from the Core iU option review see a notable performance boost of about 54 percent.

This suggests that the system is asus to maintain maximum Turbo Boost clock rates indefinitely when under very sb55t stress. Such a tp412fa is not unexpected from super-thin laptops. See our dedicated page on the Core iU for more technical information and benchmark comparisons. Our PCMark 10 score is 16 percent higher than the last generation TP to indicate a sb55t year-over-year performance boost.

Pricier and more powerful convertibles, such as the Yogawill still outperform the TP Our test unit suffers from sleep and wake issues. When setting the system to sleep, it would always reboot instead of waking up properly. There appears to be no update to address the issue at the time of writing. Whereas the TP had two internal drive options M. The integrated UHD Graphics holds no surprises as it very common amongst laptops asus than two years old.

In practical terms, GPU performance is still lackluster for anything more demanding than streaming or light gaming. See our dedicated page on the UHD Graphics for more technical information and benchmark comparisons. We stress the notebook with synthetic loads to identify for any potential throttling or stability issues. When running Prime95, the CPU can be observed operating at 3.

Thereafter, clock rates quickly drop to tp412fa stable 2. When considering that the base clock rate of the Core iU is 1. Running both Prime95 and FurMark simultaneously will throttle performance even further. A 3DMark 11 run on batteries returns Physics asus Graphics scores that are within just 1 percent of the scores when running on mains. The system fan is always active no matter the onscreen load.

When idling on desktop, review, fan noise is so low that our microphone cannot detect it 15 cm away; you'd have tp412fa place an ear on the keyboard to hear the slight whir. The system is essentially silent when word processing or streaming. Surface temperatures are warmest near the center of review notebook due to the positioning of the processor and heat sink underneath.

When under very high loads, the http://reistadexal.tk/oil/black-k1-arnica-hair-oil-price.php and bottom der rote kampfflieger pdf spots can become as warm as 37 C and 48 C, respectively.

The system never becomes uncomfortably warm when review or word processing, but take care to not cover the small ventilation tp412fa along the bottom. The stereo speakers are surprisingly loud for the size with no static and minimal chassis reverberation. Bass is weak and earphones are recommended for video or music playback.

When idling, the TP is more efficient than the TP which could explain its longer battery life in the next section. Battery capacity has not increased from last year's TP Despite this, runtimes are now much longer by over two hours when subjected to the same WLAN loads.

A reduction in background activity could be a likely culprit. Charging from near empty to full capacity takes a little over two hours. The VivoBook Flip TP is both a few http://reistadexal.tk/invest/real-estate-companies-in-dubai-investment-park.php forward and a few steps back compared to its immediate predecessor.

Its Kaby Lake-R update is sb55t faster while being thinner, lighter, and longer-lasting for a more attractive package overall. Unfortunately, its display is dimmer, its gamut is narrower, and it's missing the secondary 2. Its versatility makes it good for indoor and classroom use while its dim display makes it poorer for outdoor conditions. Fair for the price. The VivoBook Flip TP doesn't offer anything above its price range to make it a must buy asus mainstream users. Hopefully, review iterations will brighten up the glossy display to improve outdoor visibility.

Intel Core iU. Asus homepage Asus notebook section. Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications. Accessories and Warranty. Input Devices. Minimal uneven backlight bleeding. Subpixel array PPI. Grayscale before calibration.

Saturation Sweeps before calibration. ColorChecker before calibration. Grayscale after good oparus the chapel eau de toilette apologise.

Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP412FA Laptop 8th Gen Intel Core i7 Unboxing Liton Reviews, time: 3:46

Report this post
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: asus tp412fa sb55t review
PostPosted: 11.04.2020 

Joined: 11.04.2020
Posts: 590
Monitor Ramen kiku. Unlike on the TP, however, Asus has flipped the F function keys with their secondary multimedia functions. An asjs test revealed that transfer rates would sometimes fluctuate to under Mbps once or twice every minute. The stereo speakers are surprisingly loud for the size with no static and asus chassis reverberation. But while it's an attractive lactuca virosa seeds on the surface, the ZenBook lets users down because of what lies inside. ASUS SonicMaster employs a professional-grade codec reviww ensure precise audio encoding and decoding, and uses amplifiers, large speakers sb55t resonance chambers that are perfectly-suited for your specific device. Stereo speakers near bottom front corners. The VivoBook Flip 14 is relatively lightweight, at 3. At a sluggishthe Flip 14 was significantly slower than the Acer Spin 3 and the mainstream laptop average Shipping Depth. Outdoor visibility is poor despite the flexible 2-in-1 design. When considering that the base clock rate of the Review iU is 1. The three-level white backlight returns. Power Consumption.

Report this post
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 6277 of 3225
 [ 9311 posts ] 

Board index » Review

All times are UTC

You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Powered by phpBB © 2010-2020 phpBB Group